Showing posts with label Holocaust. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Holocaust. Show all posts

Thursday, September 8, 2016

So What If Adolf Hitler Was A Christian? (Would Hitler’s Christianity hurt Historic Christianity?)

            The antagonists of Historic Christianity claim that Adolf Hitler was a Christian and that Historic Christianity was the primary cause of the holocaust. The defenders of Historic Christianity counter-argue that Hitler was not a Christian or he may have been an atheist and that his non-Christian worldview was the primary cause of the holocaust.

            The holocaust, masterminded by Hitler and his Nazi regime, devoured 11 million lives, among them were 6 million Jews, and the other 5 million comprising of people with mental and physical disabilities, communists, resistance fighters, Slavic people, homosexuals, priests, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and anarchists etc.

            If Hitler was a Christian, would Hitler’s Christianity hurt Historic Christianity? In order to think through this theme, let us consider the case for Hitler’s Christianity, the case for Hitler’s non-Christianity, and the interpretation of Hitler’s apparent Christianity.

Hitler Was A Christian

            The high priest of Atheism Richard Dawkins, in response to Pope Benedict XVI praising the British for having fought the Nazi’s, claimed that Hitler was not an atheist but a Catholic Christian. Dawkins quoted Hitler’s 1922 speech wherein he referred to Jesus as “my Lord and Savior.”1

            Popular atheist author Michael A. Sherlock in his article “The Atheist Atrocities Fallacy – Hitler, Stalin & Pol Pot” claimed that Hitler was a Christian, “…Hitler was a Christian.  This undeniable fact couldn’t be made any clearer than by his own confessions…

            To begin, here are just a few of Hitler’s Christian confessions:

            “My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter.  It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God’s truth!  was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter.  In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders.  How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison.  To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross.  As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice…For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people.” [3]

            “The greatness of Christianity did not arise from attempts to make compromises with those philosophical opinions of the ancient world which had some resemblance to its own doctrine, but in the unrelenting and fanatical proclamation and defense of its own teaching.” [4]

            “His [the Jew’s] life is of this world only and his mentality is as foreign to the true spirit of Christianity as is character was foreign to the great Founder of this new creed two thousand years ago. And the Founder of Christianity made no secret indeed of His estimation of the Jewish people. When He found it necessary He drove those enemies of the human race out of the Temple of God; because then, as always, they used religion as a means of advancing their commercial interests. But at that time Christ was nailed to the Cross for his attitude towards the Jews…” [5]

            Over and above these solid testimonies, there are other equally strong pieces of evidence that indicate that Hitler was a Christian, like the fact that his soldiers all wore the slogan, ‘Gott Mit Uns’ (God with us) on their belts, that his birthday was “celebrated from the pulpits until his death,” as Hitchens so eloquently put it, and that the Nazis published their own slightly revised Christian bible. [6]…”2

Hitler Was Not A Christian

            As much as the atheist argues for Hitler’s Christianity, there is enough evidence to argue that Hitler was not a Christian.

            Hitler and his Nazi regime were much influenced by the ideology of German philosopher and thinker, Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900). Hitler was consumed by the idea of “Superman” (who has a great “will to power” and would reign over other humans) that was taken from Nietzsche’s work “Thus Spoke Zarathustra.”

            Nietzsche’s sister, Elizabeth Förster-Nietzsche was married to Bernhard Fӧrster, a prominent leader of the German anti-Semitic movement. Elizabeth was also a friend of Hitler. Elizabeth influenced the Nazi regime to an extent that Hitler was influenced by the Nietzschean ideology.

            Hitler was so fascinated by the Nietzschean ideology that he had copies of “Thus Spoke Zarathustra” given to all his soldiers between 1933 and 1945. Hitler often visited the Nietzsche museum in Weimar at the invite of Elizabeth and proudly posed for photographs of him staring at the bust of Nietzsche.

            When Hitler began his career, Germany was mostly a Christian nation. So Hitler often referred to himself as a follower of Christ. However, Hitler either imprisoned or executed more than 6000 clergymen on the charge of treasonable activity.

            Significantly, after establishing the “National Reich Church” that projected Hitler as superman / god, Hitler banned the Bible and the cross. Bibles were replaced with copies of Mein Kampf and the cross was replaced with swastika.

            Hitler also printed his version of the Bible, wherein words such as Messiah and Hallelujah were altered. Ten Commandments were revised to 12 Commandments. Hitler demanded worship; the Lord’s Prayer was revised, “Adolf Hitler, you are our great Fuhrer. Thy name makes the enemy tremble. Thy Third Reich comes; thy will alone is law upon the earth. Let us hear daily thy voice, and order us by thy leadership, for we will obey to the end, even with our lives We praise thee; hail Hitler Fuhrer my Fuhrer, given me by God. Protect and preserve my life for long. You saved Germany in time of need; I thank you for my daily bread; be with me for a long time, do not leave me, Fuhrer my Fuhrer, my faith, my light – hail, my Fuhrer.”3 This was recited by the Hitler Youth.

            Hitler systematically gained control over the Protestant churches in Germany to make them an instrument of the Nazi regime. In response, the “Confessing Church” movement gained momentum within the German Protestant Churches to resist Hitler’s attempt.

            Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a German theologian, pastor and a founding member of the “Confessing Church.” Bonhoeffer and other leaders of the Confessing Church opposed the Nazi regime and sought to establish the true identity of the Church. Ultimately, Bonhoeffer was executed by hanging.

            Think about this; had Hitler been a genuine Christian what was the necessity for a Christian rebellion against Hitler? Christians subscribing to Historic Christianity fervently opposed Hitler to an extent that they risked their own lives. They were either imprisoned or executed for their anti-Hitler rebellion.

So What If Hitler Was A Christian?

            When our atheist friend argues that Hitler was a self proclaimed Christian, should the defenders of Historic Christianity negate that argument to begin a street fight with the atheist? Debunking Hitler’s Christianity need not be the one and the only option for us.

            The other option is to ask a question, “So What If Hitler Was A Christian?” The atheist primarily posits Hitler’s self proclamation as evidence to his Christianity. Self proclamation is inadequate to one’s identity as a Christian. A genuine Christian not only proclaims himself to be a Christian, but also obeys Christ through his deeds.

            Genuine Christians do not kill as Hitler did. The very extermination of the 11 million people screams against Hitler’s so-called Christianity. Hitler’s execution of the leadership of the confessing church that included Dietrich Bonhoeffer, who actually sought to establish the true identity of the church, is most surely not a genuine Christian’s deed.

            Friedrich Nietzsche was not a Christian; he constantly attacked the Christian ideals. A genuine Christian would not follow the Nietzschean ideology.  

            Significantly, a genuine Christian would not elevate himself into a position of “Superman” demanding worship of any form whatsoever. On the other hand, Hitler, so fascinated by Friedrich Nietzsche, and so desperate to be a superman, demanded that people revere him.

            Therefore, however which way we may want to think, Hitler, even though he may have been a self-proclaimed Christian, was not a genuine Christian. So Hitler’s Christianity does not harm Historic Christianity, and any claim to Hitler’s Christianity can and should be ignored completely.

Endnotes:

Websites cited were last accessed on September 8, 2016.

1https://whydoyoubelieve.org/2016/09/01/hitlers-religion-christian-apologetics-faces-the-hitler-question/

2 https://michaelsherlockauthor.wordpress.com/2014/10/21/the-atheist-atrocities-fallacy-hitler-stalin-pol-pot-in-memory-of-christopher-hitchens/

3http://www.cbn.com/700club/features/churchhistory/godandhitler/

Monday, June 2, 2014

Who Rapes Children and Forces them to Eat Excreta?


            On May 30, 2014 Reuters reported the arrest of the owner and the manager of an underprivileged children’s boarding school in India because “five minors said they were raped, forced to watch pornographic films and act them out with one another…The children were made to eat faeces as a punishment if they did not comply.”1 Who in the right mind can construct a deed so evil to destroy lives rather irreparably?

            To force porn on children, to act them out with each other, and to rape them is horrendous evil. But to force the children to eat faeces (excreta) when they failed to comply with the evil demands is ridiculously horrendous. What kind of a mind is so evil?

            Ravi Zacharias speaks about “Snake Alley,”2 where men consume a combination of snake’s blood and alcohol and then molest children for their sexual pleasure. The youngest child rescued from this abuse was merely 11 months old.

            What kind of a mind practices and allows this horrendous evil to be practiced? The “snake alley” exists in reality. Had the authorities cracked down on this practice, it would not have continued. Who in their right mind allows such a practice to continue?

            The life of GG Allin, an American punk-rock singer and best known for his evil and appallingly nauseating practices may offer us a clue to the answers we are seeking. A peep into his thoughts uttered on the shows of Jerry Springer and Jane Whitney revealed his inherent anger that generated a non-conformist attitude.3 Wikipedia reports that he had a very troubled childhood under an abusive father.4 Therefore the nurture of an individual does seem to play a vital role in his making. 

            Fundamentally, can those who directly and indirectly force children into horrendously evil practices, and those such as GG Allin, be godly or can they call themselves as god fearing? I do not think so. (GG Allin was a self-proclaimed messiah!)

            Those who identify themselves as godly or god fearing cannot persist in doing horrendously evil deeds.

            From Christianity’s vantage point, man is not saved because of good works, but by the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, who the man unconditionally believes, loves, obeys and glorifies in and through his life. Therefore, those who believe in the Lord Jesus will not and cannot be a part of horrendously evil deeds.

            Those who identify themselves as genuine Christians would not rape, torture children with porn or force them to eat faeces. Genuine Christians would not appreciate GG Allin or follow him, let alone do what he did.

            I am not saying that genuine Christians would be sinless. The Bible says that all are sinners. But the Bible also says that genuine Christians would not continue sinning – especially the horrendous sins.

            Genuine Christians will sincerely detest sins and will earnestly pray to be delivered from their sinful ways. By the grace of God, genuine Christians would gradually overcome their sins.

            For the sake of convenience and clarity but certainly not to import any theological nuance let me organize sins into two broad categories. The two categories would be based on the premise that human life is sacred (Cf. Genesis 1: 26, 9: 6). Thus the two categories of sins could be:

            (1) Sins that directly desacralize (destroy life’s sacredness) another human life (e.g. rape, murder, and other tortures etc.).

            (2) Sins that do not directly desacralize another human life (selfish ambition, dissensions, factions and envy etc).5

            Although a Christian may continue blindly in the sin of selfish ambition (a sin that does not directly desacralize another life), he cannot and would not continue blindly in the sin of rape or child molestation because these sins directly destroy another human life.

            Desacralization of a life is only possible when love is violated. Love of God and fellow neighbor is the core mandate of Christianity. Therefore, those who repeatedly murder, rape and force others into nauseatingly dreadful acts cannot be godly. They cannot identify themselves as god-fearing. They are a godless breed.

            It’s the absence of God in the person’s life that motivates him into desacralizing, sinful and appalling deeds. The persistent serial killers and serial rapists may possess a name that identifies them with a religion, but it’s only the name that is religious, not the person.

            Nevertheless, it’s the intent of a few to label those committing horrendous crimes as Christians. The malicious intent is to tarnish and ridicule Christianity.

            For instance, some label Adolf Hitler as a Christian. The evil deed of Hitler to murder six million Jews that included one million Jewish children and two million Jewish women is so horrendous that he simply could not have been a Christian. Even if he had been a Christian, he would have been a namesake Christian and not a practicing or a Christ-loving Christian.

            The Jews were not aggressive with Hitler. Given this fact, Hitler had no genuine reason whatsoever to murder the infants, the aged, the women, and even the men.

            But Hitler committed that methodical genocide since he considered the Jews to be an economic burden to Germany. Wikipedia quotes German historian Eberhard Jäckel who recorded that “in 1986 that one distinctive feature of the Holocaust was that: never before had a state with the authority of its responsible leader decided and announced that a specific human group, including its aged, its women and its children and infants, would be killed as quickly as possible, and then carried through this resolution using every possible means of state power.”6

            Because Hitler showed no love towards the Jews and because he massacred them, it would be very reasonable to state that Hitler was not a Christian. If he had been one, he would not have killed them.

            Therefore, the logical progression of this argument would be as follows:

            (A) To love a person is not to kill him.

            (B) Christianity mandates its believers to love God and fellow neighbor, and teaches not to murder.

            (C) Hitler did not love the Jewish race. He murdered millions of Jews.

            (D) Hence, Hitler was not a Christian.

            From another perspective, even if a person claims to be a Christian and continues to kill and rape, a proper understanding of the Bible does not permit a deliberation that God would allow this person into an eternal cohabitation with HIM. This person would not have been a Christian to begin with.

            At the cost of repetition, the most basic attribute of a Christian is to love his neighbor as he loves himself. Therefore, murder, rape and other desacralizing tortures are surely out of question in a Christian life. When a Christian grossly violates this mandate, there simply is no reason to believe his Christianity. 

            Such a person cannot even believe in any god for that matter. He most surely ought to be godless.

            But that lands us in another difficult predicament. Are all godless people ruthless tyrants? There are very good people even among the godless. These are those who are very kind, loving, and charitable. So, not all godless people are ruthless tyrants.

            I will conclude by saying that those who desacralize fellow human beings ought to be godless and downright depraved in their mind – to the extent of being demonic. The demonic depravity of a human mind generates an absolute blindness upon life’s sacredness of a fellow human being.

            When one does not recognize the life’s sacredness of another, he would most surely inflict any harm upon that life for self-gratifying carnal pleasures. Therefore, only a godless, depraved and a demonic human can perform horrendously evil deeds.

P.S: When we argue that a Christian cannot perform dastardly deeds such as murder and rape, one can retort through an argument that the God of the Bible is a moral monster who killed many. That the God of the Bible is not a moral monster has been reasonably and most adequately established.  My thoughts on this subject will be shared at a later time.

Endnotes:

1 http://in.reuters.com/article/2014/05/30/us-india-abuse-idINKBN0EA0DZ20140530

2http://books.google.co.in/books?id=JrbtwyFBTe0C&pg=PT46&lpg=PT46&dq=snake+alley+ravi+zacharias&source=bl&ots=LBKuO8BgYf&sig=MXvLOfAIjrnZgQi28m_Of0GdDRI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=TrSJU5_PIYujugTCk4DABQ&sqi=2&ved=0CEMQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=snake%20alley%20ravi%20zacharias&f=false

3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OzPfYcpe8c & https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2LvZd_9aMU

4 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GG_Allin

5 Sins such as selfish ambitions, dissensions, factions and envy need not necessarily desacralize another human life directly. For instance, selfish ambition yields inordinate and greedy accumulation of property or power but not a destruction of another life.


6 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust 




Monday, September 30, 2013

Does God Kill Those Who Kill Christians? A Christian’s Thought to the Recent Church Bombing and Earthquake in Pakistan

On 22nd September 2013, militants killed many Christians at a Church in Peshawar, Pakistan.1 On 25th September 2013, a powerful 7.7 magnitude earthquake hit the Baluchistan region of Pakistan killing more.2 Are these two events connected? Was this earthquake God’s response to the killing of HIS people?

Whenever Christian persecution is followed by a natural disaster, many Christians may think, “Is God punishing the persecutors of Christians?” We do not know God’s mind in any specific situation (unless HE reveals), but let us think if God punishes persecution. Only temporal punishment - punishment in this time and age - will be considered.  

The best starting place is the Bible; does the Bible contain narratives of God’s punishment of persecutors? Christ’s crucifixion is often considered the greatest crime in human history. Pontius Pilate released Barabbas the thief, and ordered Christ’s crucifixion. The Bible doesn’t mention any punishment upon Pilate by God for his gory crime. The soldiers mocked and abused Christ, yet the Bible doesn’t state God’s punishment upon these evil soldiers. Similarly, God didn’t punish those who persecuted Apostle Paul. The New Testament seems not to focus on God’s punishment on the perpetrators of evil. “Why are the evil unpunished?” seems to be the bewildered cry of the persecuted. In fact, the New Testament glorifies the persecuted (Matthew 5: 10-12), but the fate of the persecutors in God’s hands is not the focal point.

Is it then wrong for a Christian to ponder if natural disasters are God’s punishment of the wicked? A closer look at the Bible reveals certain pointers. The Lord ordained Queen Jezebel to a horrendous death for her propensity to evil (1 Kings 21: 23; 2 Kings 9: 30-33). Verses such as Proverbs 3: 33 could prompt anyone to contemplate that natural disasters are an entailment of evil perpetrated against Christians. A diligent Christian should however observe the ways of the immutable God. Cain, the first man to be born of humans, committed the first ever murder in human history and was cursed by God. Graciously, God protected him against murder (Genesis 4: 15). Therefore, while there is legitimacy in musing over the ‘persecution-punishment’ conundrum, one should not impetuously arrive at concrete notions without contextually adequate evidences.

Let’s retreat to the Holocaust. Hitler massacred millions of Jews - God’s chosen race. But he committed suicide when he was about to be captured.3 There is no evidence that Hitler’s suicide is God’s punishment. History does not indicate God’s punishment upon the murderous dictators – Pol Pot and Joseph Stalin. Just as the Bible does not unanimously declare God’s immediate punishment upon the perpetrators of evil against HIS people, history is silent about God’s punishment upon murderous dictators, who massacred millions. A pattern is established; evil seems to prosper, God’s children suffer, and God seems to be deafeningly silent amidst HIS children’s trials and tribulations.

Let us consider other natural disasters to observe if there were any antecedent Christian persecution(s) that prompted God to act through natural disasters. I don’t recollect any major Christian persecution in Japan before the tsunami in 2011. Thousands were killed in the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami. This disaster adversely impacted Indonesia, Sri Lanka, India and Thailand. Once again, no significant Christian persecution can be identified as a probable cause for this disaster.

Some Christians could assert that God punished Japan since the Japanese did not seek God (Shinto and Buddhism are Japan’s major religions). One can employ the same principle in the case of Indonesia, Sri Lanka, India and Thailand. If this was factual, one should posit the reason behind selective punishment of evil or reasons behind God’s permission of greater evils. Permit me to elaborate.

Why were Stalin, Pol Pot and the likes allowed to live and kill many? Why did God not punish Nietzsche early enough to prevent the holocaust? Since Hitler was impacted by Nietzsche’s ideologies, one can reasonably posit a Nietzschean fingerprint on the horrendous holocaust. Presently, why is the bulldog of Atheism, Richard Dawkins, allowed by God to malign HIM and in the process lead others? Please read Dawkins’ view of God in his book ‘God Delusion,’ “The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.” Isn’t this quote sufficient for God to purge Dawkins? If we proclaim that God punishes the perpetrators of evil, such as in Pakistan, we should also be able to proclaim the reasons behind selective punishment of God and the wisdom behind God allowing the Dawkins’ of today. Theodicy offers reasonable answers. But the scope of this blog is limited to ‘persecution-punishment’ conundrum.

If the persecution (Church bombing) occurred in Peshawar, shouldn’t the punishment also have occurred at Peshawar? What’s the merit in punishing the residents of Baluchistan for the persecution at Peshawar? Or did the dead in Baluchistan play a role in the church bombing at Peshawar? In the absence of concrete evidence that convicts the affected people in Baluchistan of architecting the church bombing, we would be wise in not proclaiming even a thought analogous to punishment.

But people mutate as puzzling prophets! A case in point is the proclamation of Congresswoman Michele Bachman that God brought about the earthquake to intervene in Pakistan.4 (I have nothing for or against this lady, but permit me to use her as a tool for thought.) Is her verdict a subjective conviction or a definite revelation of God?

The Bible portrays prophets under two categories: True and False. A case in point was that of Jeremiah and Hananiah, the former bowing under the yoke symbolizing servitude, and the latter breaking the yoke symbolizing liberation (Jeremiah 28). Thankfully, the Bible affirmed Jeremiah as the true prophet. Today we struggle to distinguish the truth from false, especially when a dubious prophet proclaims that God brought about a natural disaster in response to a moral failure.

God who created life and all that is, is sovereign to eliminate anything from existence. Nothing occurs without God’s knowledge, and the sovereign God can prevent anything from occurring. Thus, the earthquake in Pakistan or any natural disaster is brought about or allowed by God (cf. Isaiah 45: 7; Daniel 9: 14; Matthew 24: 7b). But did God unleash an earthquake as a punishment to the church bombing? There are no valid answers, other than a proclamation from a subjective perspective.

Is Congresswoman Michele Bachman a credible prophet whose prophecies have been fulfilled in the past? Unless we observe evidences we need not consider her seriously.

Prophecy should either predict the future or expose the sinfully dark past with a view to bring about a transformation. Deuteronomy 18: 21-22 is outside our context, since Congresswoman Michele Bachman didn’t predict the earthquake, but spoke after the devastation. The mould of Prophet Nathan’s prophecy to King David is also outside our context, since he exposed the true sinful intent behind the murder of Uriah, which was a cover-up to the adultery between David and Bathsheba. Unaware of the incident before it occurred, Prophet Nathan challenged King David with truth from God. David recognized God in Nathan. In our context, a similar prophecy could be to expose the intricate details about the masterminds of the church bombing (reason, names, clues leading to their arrest etc.). This would not only authenticate the prophet but also help the investigators to nail the criminals. Such is not the case with Congresswoman Michele Bachman. She has simply uttered that God is teaching Pakistan a lesson through the earthquake. This may or may not be true.

As sinners, we can cognize every positive and negative occurrence as God’s intervention. But this should apply to all, not a select few! So any broadcast of God contextual intervention in Pakistan without any objective evidence should be relegated to the realm of a presumptuous utterance. It’s ok for her to speak (freedom of speech), and it’s ok for us to hear her thoughts. But let us place her thoughts in the backburner of our minds and move forward.

In conclusion, deficiency of evidences of God’s wrath upon Pakistan should motivate Christians towards a godly and a legitimate reaction. First, pray for those affected whose lives are changed rather irreparably. Second, if we are able, we should offer material assistance, for we are mandated to love our neighbor. Third, if we cannot corroborate our inner convictions with objective evidences, we should refrain from uttering derogatory statements that adds more pain to a burning wound. Many lives need our moral and physical support, so let us be agents of love and comfort in this situation. May God bless us all. Amen.

References:
1 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/23/world/asia/pakistan-church-bombing.html and http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-24193734

2 http://earthsky.org/earth/powerful-7-8-magnitude-earthquake-strikes-pakistan-today

3 http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/people/adolf_hitler


4 http://www.newslo.com/michele-bachmann-says-god-used-earthquake-to-shake-up-pakistan/