Saturday, December 14, 2024

Guidance from An Early Christian Teaching on Living a Christ-Centered Life

The question of how Christians should live their lives resonates with every sincere believer.

The early Christian apologetic text, The Letter to Diognetus, provides a profound and compelling teaching from which every Christian can learn.

CompellingTruth.org describes this letter as follows:

"The Letter to Diognetus, also sometimes referred to as The Epistle of Mathetes to Diognetus, is a letter defending the Christian faith. Believed to have been written between AD 130 and AD 180, this letter is possibly the earliest example of Christian apologetics, which is the exercise of using reasoned arguments to defend Christian belief and practice. The letter was found in a thirteenth-century codex ascribed to Justin Martyr and first published in 1592. Because of its reasoned defense of Christianity, many transcripts of the letter were made, which is fortunate because the original was destroyed in a fire in 1870 during the Franco-Prussian War.

The Greek writer and recipient are unknown. Mathetes means 'student' or 'disciple,' and Diognetus means 'God-born.' The writer claims to be a disciple of the apostles and uses language consistent with an ancient Christian community known as Johannine Christians, who emphasized the apostle John's teachings. The recipient being addressed as 'God-born' is also consistent with John's teaching that those who believe are 'born of God' (John 1:12–13; 1 John 3:9; 4:7; 5:1, 4, 18)."*

Source: CompellingTruth.org

 May God bless you as you read this wonderful teaching from the second century. May our lives be shaped to reflect Christ in all that we do. You can read the full text here: Christian-History.org

 

Chapter Five

Christians are not distinguished from other men by country, language, nor by the customs which they observe. They do not inhabit cities of their own, use a particular way of speaking, nor lead a life marked out by any curiosity. The course of conduct they follow has not been devised by the speculation and deliberation of inquisitive men. The do not, like some, proclaim themselves the advocates of merely human doctrines.

Instead, they inhabit both Greek and barbarian cities, however things have fallen to each of them. And it is while following the customs of the natives in clothing, food, and the rest of ordinary life that they display to us their wonderful and admittedly striking way of life.

They live in their own countries, but they do so as those who are just passing through. As citizens they participate in everything with others, yet they endure everything as if they were foreigners. Every foreign land is like their homeland to them, and every land of their birth is like a land of strangers.

They marry, like everyone else, and they have children, but they do not destroy their offspring.

They share a common table, but not a common bed.

They exist in the flesh, but they do not live by the flesh. They pass their days on earth, but they are citizens of heaven. They obey the prescribed laws, all the while surpassing the laws by their lives.

They love all men and are persecuted by all. They are unknown and condemned. They are put to death and restored to life.

They are poor, yet make many rich. They lack everything, yet they overflow in everything.

They are dishonored, and yet in their very dishonor they are glorified; they are spoken ill of and yet are justified; they are reviled but bless; they are insulted and repay the insult with honor; they do good, yet are punished as evildoers; when punished, they rejoice as if raised from the dead. They are assailed by the Jews as barbarians; they are persecuted by the Greeks; yet those who hate them are unable to give any reason for their hatred.

Chapter Six

To sum it all up in one word, what the soul is in the body, that is what Christians are in the world.

The soul is dispersed through all the parts of the body, and Christians are scattered through all the cities of the world. The soul lives in the body, yet is not of the body; Christians live in the world, yet are not of the world.

Sunday, September 15, 2024

Pope Francis Makes Headlines Again! Is Every Religion A Way To Arrive At God?

 


Vatican News reported, “During an interreligious meeting at Singapore's Catholic Junior College, Pope Francis urged young people to work toward unity, become responsible citizens, and pass down what they have learned to future generations.” He continued, “God is God for all, and if God is God for all, then we are all sons and daughters of God.” Pope Francis also said, “All religions are paths to reach God. They are, to make a comparison, like different languages or dialects to get there. But God is God for everyone.”1

Is every religion a way to arrive at God? Are all religions the same? Do all religions lead to heaven?

No.

In an earlier blog of mine, I explained why all religions cannot lead to God & heaven:2

“Three reasons could be posited to explain why all religions cannot lead us to God and heaven:

            1. Every major religion contradicts the other.

            2. There can be only one God.

            3. There can be only one means of salvation.

Every Major Religion Contradicts The Other

Every major religion claims exclusivity. I provided a glimpse of the exclusivity claims of the major world religions in an earlier article of mine, entitled Exclusivity Claims of Major World Religions. While discussing the exclusivity claims of Hinduism, I wrote, “Hinduism excludes other religions based on its core doctrines. Consider the doctrine of God in Hinduism. Brahman, the absolute God of Hinduism, is a mysterious being.

Although Brahman is one God, he manifests in innumerable forms, “Hinduism is unique because it is essentially a monotheistic faith which acknowledges polytheism as reflective of the diversity in God’s creation. God is one, but also many. He manifests Himself in innumerable forms and shapes.” But the God of Christianity does not manifest Himself in innumerable forms. Hence, Hinduism should exclude Christianity or Islam on the basis of the Godhead. The same holds true for doctrines such as karma and reincarnation, which absolutely contradict Christianity and other religions.”

Even Islam, Buddhism and Judaism claim exclusivity. So if every religion contradicts the other, then all religions are not teaching the truth. Only one religion would teach the truth, whereas the others do not.

Historic Christianity also claims exclusivity. Conservative Christians believe that Jesus is the only way to heaven. This belief renders every non-Christian as an eternal inhabitant of hell. But the conclusion that Jesus is the only way to heaven is predicated on the premise that Christianity is the only religion that makes valid truth claims.

Since every religion contradicts the other, all religions cannot lead man to God and heaven.

One God

God is the ‘maximally great being’ or the ‘greatest conceivable being’ or the ‘greatest being possible.’ The maximally great being should be omnipotent (infinitely powerful), omniscient (possessing unlimited knowledge), and morally perfect, to say the least. 

Such a maximally great being ought to be singular. In other words, there cannot be two maximally great beings. They cannot be maximally great if they are equal. Maximal greatness signifies that one of the two would essentially be greater than the other.

Therefore, there can only be one God.

One Salvation

Salvation is the deliverance from the power and penalty of sin. Sin is an assault on God. In other words, sin is the transgression or violation of God’s commands.

If God is one, then the sin of mankind is essentially against that God (because there are no other Gods). Hence, there can be only one means of salvation, for it is that one infinite God who offers the means of salvation to erring finite humans.

But what if God offers two or more means of salvation to the erring humans? Is this possible? It is possible as long as the means of salvation do not contradict each other.

There are two major means of salvation offered by the major world religions. While Historic Christianity offers salvation by the grace of God through faith in Christ, the other major world religions teach salvation through good works.

Salvation by grace through faith is a non-negotiable tenet of Historic Christianity. Historic Christianity teaches that mankind cannot perform good works (i.e. be perfectly obedient to God) to go to heaven because man is a perpetual sinner. Hence, God graciously sent HIS Son, the Lord Jesus Christ to die on behalf of all (the sins) of mankind, thereby paying the penalty for sin, which is death. Christ then overcame death through HIS resurrection and ascension. Thereby, those who believe in Christ are saved by virtue of Christ’s one-time perfect sacrifice and their belief in HIM.

Contrarily, the other major world religions teach that mankind would have to perform good works i.e. being obedient to God, to go to heaven. For instance, Islam teaches that worship of God and obedience to his commands are the prerequisites for salvation.

Hence, salvation by grace through faith contradicts salvation through good works. Since the means of salvation in other religions and Christianity contradict each other, there could only be one way to be saved.

Conclusion

There is only one way to God. All religions cannot lead us to God. Those believing that all religions lead to God are treading dangerously. They are risking their eternity.

If you are in that boat, think this through and make sense of your life. If you pray to God to lead you to the right path, HE will. May the truth set you free.

 

Endnotes:

1https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2024-09/pope-calls-singapore-youth-unity-during-interreligous-dialogue1.html

2https://rajkumarrichard.blogspot.com/2019/01/three-reasons-why-all-religions-do-not.html

Websites last accessed on 15th September, 2024.

Monday, August 5, 2024

DOES JESUS CHRIST HAVE TWO WILLS OR ONE? (MONOTHELITISM OR DYOTHELITISM)

Whether God incarnate, Jesus Christ, has two wills or one is pertinent for a better understanding of our Lord Jesus and how His truly human and truly divine natures relate to one another. Before we proceed any further, let us define certain vital terms related to our context:

Person: “Person” is a center of self-consciousness, intentionality, and will.1

Nature: That which makes humans distinctly human rather than animals.

Will: That which enables a deliberate action.

Monothelitism: Jesus has only one will – a divine will.

Dyothelitism: Jesus has two wills – a human and a divine.

Jesus Christ is a divine person (the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity) with both a divine nature and a human nature (the Hypostatic Union). Therefore, the question of wills in Jesus Christ is predicated on whether the will is a function of the “person” or the “nature.”

If the will is a function of the person, then Jesus Christ should have only one will, which is the divine will. If the will is a function of one’s nature, then Jesus Christ should have two wills—one divine and one human—because Jesus has two natures: one divine and one human.

Ligonier.org explains why the church voted in favor of the Dyothelitism view: “Monothelitism was declared a heresy and the reason it was declared a heresy is because the church concluded a will is in extent an essential part of a nature. If Jesus didn't have a human will as well as the divine will, it would be very difficult to see him as truly and fully human. We know he has a divine will because he was the Logos from all eternity and the second person in trinity that has a will. So, we know he has a divine will. If he has only one will it's just the divine will and the church, I think, rightly concluded that that would mean he did not have a fully human nature because he wouldn't have a fully human will.”2

On the contrary, Dr. William Lane Craig holds to Monothelitism. He states, “…the will is properly a faculty of a person rather than of a nature, I believe that there is but one will in Christ, despite his having two natures. For there is one person who is Christ, namely, the divine second person of the Trinity.”3

A common objection posed to the Monothelitism view is: if the will is a function of personhood, then would the Triune God—who is one God in the form of three persons—possess three distinct wills? If so, would these wills contradict each other? If they contradict each other, then they cease to be God, as this situation would limit God’s omniscience.

William Lane Craig states that God’s absolute perfection entails a perfect harmony between their wills, “Now if we affirm a robust conception of a person as a center of self-consciousness, intentionality, and will, as I think we should, it follows that the three Trinitarian persons have three wills. Of course, as the wills of three perfect persons, their wills always agree and are in harmony. Though there are three distinct acts of will, they all will the same thing.”[Emphasis Mine]

The church affirmed Dyothelitism by considering the following verses from the Bible:

Matthew 26:39 (NIV): “My Father, if it is possible, may this cup be taken from me. Yet not as I will, but as you will.”  

Luke 22:42 (NIV): “Father, if you are willing, take this cup from me; yet not my will, but yours be done.”

John 5:30 (NET): “I can do nothing on my own initiative. Just as I hear, I judge, and my judgment is just, because I do not seek my own will, but the will of the one who sent me.”

John 6:38 (NET): “For I have come down from heaven not to do my own will but the will of the one who sent me.”

Other passages assume human will in Christ (John 4:34, 5:19. 8:29, 14:31; Rom. 5:19; Phil. 2:8; Heb. 10:9.

To defend his position, Craig argues that if the will is associated with one’s nature then Christ should have two persons – a divine and a human.5

This is nothing more than an introduction to this complicated subject where, I believe, theology and philosophy should intersect to provide an adequate understanding of it.

Endnotes:

1https://www.reasonablefaith.org/writings/question-answer/monothelitism-and-the-trinity

2https://www.ligonier.org/posts/does-jesus-have-one-or-two-wills

3https://www.reasonablefaith.org/writings/question-answer/monothelitism-and-the-trinity

4Ibid.

5https://www.reasonablefaith.org/media/other-videos/dyothelitism-vs-monothelitism & https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIr3o799aFA&ab_channel=ReasonableFaithOrg

Websites last accessed on 5th August 2024.