In February 2013, I composed my
preliminary thoughts on ‘Universalism’ under the title “Do All People Go to
Heaven?” The title remains the same, since I intend to dwell further on
Universalism. For the sake of continuity, please observe the synopsis of my
previous blog:
1. Universalism is a belief that all people
will go to heaven (inherit God’s salvation), irrespective of who, what, why and
how they are.
2. All religions are fundamentally
different; they contradict each other (E.g. Atheism negates God, and the God of
Christianity, Islam and Hinduism are fundamentally different). If religions are
poles apart, how can all people go to heaven?
3. Hell is not a literal presence for a
Universalist. The Universalist will allegorize passages from the Bible that
describes hell.
4. Universalism does not explain evil
& justice on earth. Universalism advocates an immoral world. Man can do
what he desires (even horrendous evil) and still be saved.
5. The god of the Universalist is evil (not
offended by sins and cannot stop evil) and unjust (cannot provide justice to
people). So we infer that the god Universalist’s posit is imperfect; in the
likeness of an imperfect man. This god need not be worshipped or glorified.
In order to expose the errors innate in
Universalism, we ought to establish the foundations of Historic Christianity to
reveal its intricate composition and to state the basic contradiction between
Universalism and the Historic Christianity. Then we need to understand the
nature of truth, and subsequently be convinced to reason out our belief.
Historic
Christianity
It is important to know the details of
Historic Christianity in order to identify the errors of contradictory truth
claims. Please observe the intricate interdependence of the essentials of
Historic Christianity:
1. Truth: There is absolute and objective
truth.
2. The reliability of the Bible: The
Bible is inspired (by God), inerrant (no errors), and infallible (trustworthy).
It is the only and the final authority for faith and life. The Bible is
absolutely truthful.1
3. Existence of God: The Bible
reveals a holy God.2
4. God’s Trinity: There is one
God, in the persons of the Father, Son, and the Holy Spirit.
5. Miracles of God: God is
supernatural and active, so HE will act. HIS supernatural acts are miracles.3
6. Incarnation: The Savior of the
world, the Lord Jesus was fully God and fully man.4
7. Total Depravity of Mankind: The
Bible reveals the total depravity (sinfulness) of mankind.
8. Condemnation of God upon Sinful Man:
The holiness of God entails God’s condemnation (wrath) upon sinners.
9. Virgin Birth: Christ was incarnate
by the Holy Spirit and born of the virgin Mary. Thus, Christ is 100% God, and does
not inherit mankind’s sin.
10. Sinlessness of Christ: Christ
lived a sinless life on earth. Only a sinless God can save mankind of all their
sins – past, present and future.
11. Grace: The gracious God saves
mankind from their sins. Salvation is a free gift, since salvation is not
gained by man’s work.
12. Faith in Christ: Man should necessarily
believe in Christ for the appropriation of Christ’s one-time, perfect sacrifice
for his salvation.
13. Crucifixion and Resurrection of
Christ: Christ died and rose again. Resurrection was mandatory for
overcoming evil and death.
14. Christ’s Bodily Ascension:
Christ’s resurrection was a bodily resurrection and HE bodily ascended to
heaven. Our resurrection will also be a bodily resurrection (glorious body).
15. Christ’s Intercession: Christ
lives to intercede for all those who believe in HIM.
16. Second coming of Christ: Christ
will come again in glory to judge mankind, to eliminate evil forever, and to
usher a life of eternal coexistence with God in the new heaven and earth.
These are the essentials of Historic
Christianity. Unbelief /denial of any one essential will nullify the others through
a chain reaction (E.g. If one denies absolute truth, then Bible is not
absolutely true, so miracles are denied and along with it Christ’s virgin birth,
resurrection, and salvation will also be denied.) Denial of any one of the essentials of Historic
Christianity is to deny Historic Christianity. Thus it is a reasonable
implication that those who deny one (or more) essential doctrine(s) of Historic
Christianity are cults or liberals or postmodern Christians.
We observe that salvation according to
Historic Christianity is by grace through faith. Only those who believe in
Christ will be saved (Christian Particularism). Those who do not believe in
Christ will not be saved. Since Universalism declares salvation of all mankind,
it totally contradicts Historic Christianity. The question that demands verdict
is whether Universalism and Historic Christianity, proclaiming contradictory
truth claims, are true within the same context of salvation.
Exclusivity
of Truth:
Can contradictory statements within the
same context be true? This leads us to examine the nature of truth. Please
think through with me:
1. Truth is pure. Truth should not
contain errors / lies.
2. Opposite of truth is an error / lie.
3. Opposite of an error / lie need not
be truth, but it could be another error / lie.
4. An error / lie could contain strands
of truth, but strands of truth will not transform the lie to truth.
If you agree to the flow of thoughts
mentioned above, then the entailments are:
1. Truth excludes errors / lies.
2. Truth is absolute, singular and
exclusive (also consistent). Hence, the opposite of truth is essentially a lie,
it cannot be another truth.
3. Simply speaking, 1+1=2, there cannot
be another answer to this equation.
If we have two truth claims, one should ascertain
if there are contradictions between the two truth claims. Contradictory truth
claims will not be true at the same time and in the same context.5
If two people are looking at the sky from
the same room and at the same time, and if one says that the sun is
brightly shining and the other says that there is no sun in the sky, only one
of them can be right. In this context, the truth is that the sun is either visible
or invisible; the sun cannot be both visible and invisible at the same time.
Moreover, if someone says, ‘there is no
truth,’ then his statement is also not true - it’s nonsensical. Someone else
could say that ‘truth’ is only a matter of opinion, and does not possess an
absolute meaning. In this case, that very statement is also a matter of opinion
and does not possess an absolute meaning, so it’s nonsensical as well.
So we can confidently affirm that truth
is absolute, singular, exclusive, and objective.
The nature of truth teaches us that
truth excludes contradictions. Since Historic Christianity and Universalism
contradict each other, both these contradicting worldviews cannot be true at
the same time and within the same context (e.g. Salvation). It’s either
Historic Christianity or Universalism, not both.
If we believe that Historic Christianity
is true, we ought to give reasons for our faith and hope. But why?
Reasons
to Offer Reasons For Our Faith:
Just as Apostle Paul reasoned out with the
Jews and the Gentiles in Athens and Corinth (Acts 17: 22 – 18: 4), we are to reason
out with those of contradictory views. A few reasons to reason out our faith
are:
Perspective of Discipleship: We are mandated to disciple others
(Matthew 28: 19). Discipling includes answering / clarifying honest questions. Those
who disciple others ought to practice their religion seriously. Serious practitioners
of religion should have a basic knowledge of other worldviews. Lack of interest
in contrasting worldviews, such as Universalism, is valid if discipleship is an
insignificant part of our life. But if we are a disciple of the Lord Jesus and practice
our religion seriously (seriously committed to it), we should explain the
reason for our serious practice and commitment. Reasoning is innate in
discipleship.
Perspective of Biblical Mandate: If we cannot explain the reason for our
hope, then we are blind in our faith and practice. If ‘unexamined life is not worth
living,’6 then ‘unexamined faith is not worth believing.’7
The unexamined faith cannot distinguish good from evil, and cannot provide
reason for the hope we have in the Triune God and the Bible. Every Christian is
mandated to demolish arguments and lofty opinions against God, and provide the
reason for his belief in Christ (cf. 2 Corinthians 10: 4-6; Hebrews 5: 14; 1
Peter 3: 15). This is the biblical mandate. Failure to provide a reason implies
shallow faith and an anticipation to disbelieve Christ when confused and
confronted with situations or arguments apparently more powerful than our faith. Moreover,
failure to offer reason for our hope in Christ is a disobedience to God and HIS
commands.
Perspective of Evangelization: We exist to help our family and
neighbors. When we know the truth, we should speak of the truth to our
neighbor. We live in the digital era; there are many who evangelize their
worldview through digital and other mediums. Transmission of our faith mandates
us to offer reasons / evidences for our faith. Failure to offer evidences reduces
our belief to a lie. Those who believe in lies are liars. If we are not liars,
we ought to substantiate the truth of our belief.
These are adequate reasons to reason out
our faith. Let us reason together, says the Lord (Isaiah 1: 18, NASB). Thus we
ought to reason the truth of Historic Christianity.
Having established the foundations, I
will, in my next blog, provide adequate reasons for Historic Christianity from other
perspectives, so to debunk Universalism. Amen.
References:
1 Every apparent contradiction in the
Bible can be reasonably explained. The Bible is the only ancient historic document
that possesses a plethora of objective reasonings and evidences for its
reliability.
2
The existence of God
can be independently explained by philosophy and science.
3
Philosopher David
Hume’s argument against miracles can be reasonably debunked.
4 Thus, Christ’s sacrifice was a perfect
sacrifice – both from the divine and human standpoint. The Lord Jesus Christ is
God incarnate, the Son of God, and the second person of the blessed Trinity. HE
saves mankind from sins.
5 Law of Non-Contradiction
6 Socrates
7 Edwin Navarro
No comments:
Post a Comment