A few years
ago a Christian missionary said this to me about a Christian family I was well acquainted with,
“…that family is suffering from that disease for many generations since they
are under curse.” This implied a presence of unrepentant sin or unbelief.
Because they are Christian, unbelief in Christ could be eliminated.
From what
was observable to plain sight, at least two people from that family, one who
passed away and another who is under the clutches of that deadly disease,
cannot be termed blatant sinners; instead I can honestly affirm their goodness.
The Bible
does indicate generational curses in Exodus 20:5, 34:7; Numbers 14:18, Deuteronomy
5:9 and Lamentations 5: 7. If we concede that generations would be adversely
affected because of the sin(s) of one or a few people belonging to that family,
the question lingers rather bitterly in our minds as to why God would punish an
innocent person for a sin that he/she did not commit.
It seems
perfectly reasonable if the person who sins, and remains unrepentant of that
sin, dies. But the death of a person (offspring / child) who hasn’t sinned, especially
when the children do not practice the sins of the ancestors, seems perfectly
unjust and unreasonable. If this were to be true, then God seems very unjust.
Punishment
of the innocent for the sins of the parent / ancestors is grossly unjust. Only
an unjust and a heartless God would punish an innocent child for the sins that
he/she didn’t commit.
The Bible, on the contrary, teaches
that God is loving and merciful, “The
Lord is compassionate and gracious, slow to anger, abounding in love”
(Psalm 103: 8, NIV et al.). The God of the Bible is also a God who loves both
the good and evil for HE, “…causes his
sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the
unrighteous” (Matthew 5: 45, NIV).
If God
loves both the evil and the good, HE would not punish the innocent for the sins
they did not commit. In fact, the Bible
posits a just God within the context of generational curses, “The person who sins will die. The son will
not bear the punishment for the father’s iniquity, nor will the father bear the
punishment for the son’s iniquity; the righteousness of the righteous will be
upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked will be upon himself”
(Ezekiel 18: 20, NASB).
The context
of Ezekiel 18: 20, found in Ezekiel 18: 2, is “generational curse.” God, in this chapter, clearly states that the children will not suffer because of the sins of parents,
“What do you people mean by going around
the country repeating the saying, The parents ate green apples, The children
got the stomachache? “As sure as I’m the living God, you’re not going to repeat
this saying in Israel any longer. Every soul—man, woman, child—belongs to me,
parent and child alike. You die for your own sin, not another’s”” (Ezekiel
18: 1-4, MSG). Thereby, God demolishes any notion of generational curses.
In face of
an explicit assertion that the person who sins will only die and not the child
who does not practice the sins of the father, we confidently claim that generational
curses does not exist in the lives of God’s people. Therefore, it is clear and
concrete that if the child does not commit the sins of the parent, then the
child remains unaffected by the sins of the parent.
But this is
not it. We need to explain the verses that indicate generational curses.
Christian theologians have already explained it rather reasonably. If a parent
is a chronic liar it’s more likely possible that the child would resort to
lying. If a parent is an alcoholic, then it’s more likely that the child could
also be an alcoholic.
But that’s
not it. When children consciously repeat the sinful practices of the parent, it
is imperative to note that the child who sins, sins on his/her own accord.
However, when
parents’ sins are consciously repeated by the children, do we say that
generational curses are active? In other words, can we invoke generational
curses when the children commit the sins of the parent?
Before we
proceed further we need to bring a certain distinction into picture. Within our
context, let’s analyze the state of a Christian family and not a non-Christian
family.
Being born
into a Christian home does not imply that the child is a Christian. The child
does not become a Christian because the parents are Christians. The child
becomes a Christian when he/she consciously repents of sins and believes only
in the Lord Jesus as God and Savior.
Therefore,
when a person believes in the Lord Jesus, every curse, including the
generational curse, is broken. The generational curse that every person
suffers from is the curse of sin that is communicated down the generations.
The Bible
teaches us that the generational curse of sin is broken when a person believes
in the Lord Jesus, “You know the story of
how Adam landed us in the dilemma we’re in—first sin, then death, and no one
exempt from either sin or death. That sin disturbed relations with God in
everything and everyone….. If death got the upper hand through one man’s
wrongdoing, can you imagine the breathtaking recovery life makes, sovereign
life, in those who grasp with both hands this wildly extravagant life-gift,
this grand setting-everything-right, that the one man Jesus Christ provides?
Here it is in a nutshell: Just as one person did it wrong and got us in all
this trouble with sin and death, another person did it right and got us out of
it. But more than just getting us out of trouble, he got us into life! One man
said no to God and put many people in the wrong; one man said yes to God and
put many in the right…” (Romans 5: 12-19, MSG).
Thus we are
simply left with this – the person who sins shall die (from an eternal
perspective) provided he/she does not believe in the Lord Jesus. If he/she
believes in the Lord Jesus, then they will live, and live eternally.
Can we
appeal to generational curses when children commit the sins of the parent?
While we ask this question, we also need to examine if there are children in
the non-Christian households who do not commit the sins of the parent.
Presence of
children who do not commit the sins of their parents among the non-Christian
households is an indication that generational curses are virtually
non-existent.
Consider this argument in a theoretical sense, if
generational curses are valid, then shouldn’t it first affect the non-Christian
households for the simple fact that they do not believe in the Lord Jesus? But
if there are instances where non-Christians households are not affected by
generational curses, then is it not utterly ridiculous that the God of the Bible
would punish HIS children, the Christians, despite their belief in HIM?
Can we
appeal to generational curses when families are plagued by genetically
heritable diseases such as diabetes (type 2), certain heart diseases, Early-onset
Familial Alzheimer Disease (eFAD) etc? Not at all, for verses such as Ephesians
1: 3 (Christians are blessed with every spiritual blessing), Colossians 1: 13,
1 John 5: 18 teach that those who believe in Christ have been delivered from
darkness and satan cannot harm them.
If you
think about it, generational curses can be deviously used to wriggle out of
many an unpleasant situation. For instance, if we want to get out of a
particular relationship, and if we find a particular disease lingering in that
family for generations, we could simply cite our unwillingness to be a part of
that family that is plagued by generational curse (disease), and wriggle out of
that relationship. Generational curses then seems to be a legitimate Christian
means to abandon relationships. But this is a deceitful act even by the corrupt
standards of this world, let alone the high moral standards defined by the
Bible.
So to
conclude, the Bible does not provide me with reasons to believe in generational
curses. Hence the notion of generational curses is utterly invalid, and those
who proclaim it are merely revealing their biblical misunderstandings. Amen.
3 comments:
It is true that that the soul who sins is the one who will die.
But we see exceptions too. eg. God told David that the son born to you will die,. We know the context.isnt it? David did not die , but the son brn to David and Bathsheba had to die. It was the parents who sinned, but the child died. David had a pretty bad time with children.
At the same time, when Saul was about to die, though he has done the detestable things to God, God said , ' tomorrow you and your sons will be with me.
God's Soverreignty is something, we will never understand well.
The best is perhaps we understand the least - CS Lewis, if i am not mistaken.
Thanks for bringing this fascinating insight to the theme of generational curses, Sarah.
Not only David's son, but the Bible describes similar instances of killing of babies: the flood, destruction of sodom and Gomorrah, destruction of Amalekites, and the conquest of Canaan. In every instance, God destroys the children for no fault of theirs.
Significantly, the theme of generational curses and the above mentioned killings are not an apple to apple comparison. The generational curses, as its popularly taught, runs into generations, whereas the above mentioned killings did not run through many generations. So the killing of David's son cannot be termed as generational curse.
Similarly, the death of Saul and his sons cannot also be termed as generational curse. In fact, Saul disobeyed God and his sons also followed Saul into waging a war without the Lord's helping hand.
Coming back to David's instance, God punishes David in different ways - David lost his wives to Absalom and then he lost his son. The death of David's son was predominantly a lesson to God's enemies who show utter contempt to God (2 Sam 12: 14).
Last but not the least, every child who dies will go to God's presence (2 Sam 12: 23). So David's son would inherit eternal life, which is the greatest good.
Hence, the killing of David's son is neither an instance of generational curse nor an immoral act of God, but a consequence of David's sin that was meant as a lesson to God's enemies.
Remain blessed, Sarah. Thanks again for your thoughts.
True,hold thing have pass away behold, all things have become new for Anyone who is truelly washed by the blood of the lamb THE WORD OF GOD,which is Jesus Christ.
Post a Comment