Atheism is
a dangerous worldview. Obviously, atheists will vehemently deny this claim. No
sane human will agree that their worldview is evil. But a proponent of atheism
reveals atheism as an evil worldview.
To say that
atheism has an innate propensity to perpetrate evil is not to assert that
religion is a peaceful worldview. Killers do represent religion. There are rank
evil people professing to some religion or the other.
Reality also
reveals many morally upright atheists. What makes an atheist a good person?
Christians
claim that atheists could be good because God’s law is written in their hearts
(Romans 2: 15). Contrarily, atheists believe that the rules of sociology,
psychology, and neurophysiology enable their good behavior [1].
A Christian
will be a good person if he loves and obeys the Lord Jesus Christ. Christ did
not teach us to hate each other rather love each other.
What makes
a religionist an evil person?
From within
a Christian perspective, if a Christian remains a namesake Christian without
any love for the Lord and the knowledge of God’s Word – the Bible, then he
would most likely be an evil person. Such a Christian would have succumbed to
the deception of the Satan.
Evil
Christians are not Christians to begin with. Those who have succumbed to Satan’s
deceptions to perpetrate evil are Satan’s disciples, not Christ’s disciples.
Other than
denying God, what is innately wrong with the atheistic worldview that it
motivates atheists to be evil? (Stalin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot are famous atheists
who ruthlessly murdered millions of people.)
If atheists
believe that rules of sociology, psychology, and neurophysiology enable their
good behavior, then it’s reasonable to deduce that corruption in sociology,
psychology, and neurophysiology would entail evil. (How would an atheist
explain the corruption that enters sociology, psychology, and neurophysiology
to motivate evil from its adherents? What is the nature and source of that corruption?
Let’s not enter that metaphysical domain now!)
Say hello
to the Church of Satan!
Do not be
surprised by the rules of existence of the “Church of Satan,” which is
published in their website, “When walking
in open territory, bother no one. If someone bothers you, ask him to stop. If he does not stop, destroy him.” “If
a guest in your lair annoys you, treat
him cruelly and without mercy” (Emphases Mine) [2].
“If he does
not stop, destroy him” ????
“… treat
him cruelly and without mercy” ????
How does the
Church of Satan justify destroying people? This is their justification, “Satan represents vengeance instead of
turning the other cheek!” [3]. The Church of Satan does not believe in the
biblical version of Satan i.e. Satan is a living spiritual being.
Satanists
or the members of Church of Satan are self-centered atheists, “Satanists
are atheists. We see the universe as being indifferent to us, and so all morals and values are subjective human
constructions.
Our
position is to be self-centered, with ourselves being the most important
person (the “God”) of our subjective universe, so we are sometimes said to
worship ourselves. Our current High Priest Gilmore calls this the step moving
from being an atheist to being an “I-Theist.”
Satan to us is a symbol of pride,
liberty and individualism, and it serves as an external metaphorical projection
of our highest personal potential. We do not believe in Satan as a being or
person” (Emphasis Mine) [4]. The fundamental belief of the Church of Satan
exposes atheism in all its glory.
When
atheists deny God, they affirm man. (They do not have another option!)
When
atheists deny [the sovereignty of] God, they affirm the sovereignty of man. The
Church of Satan blatantly declares that man is sovereign, “Our position is to be self-centered, with ourselves being the most
important person (the “God”) of our subjective universe, so we are sometimes
said to worship ourselves” [5].
When
sovereignty of man is affirmed, then as an entailment, subjectivity invades their
domain. The Church of Satan affirms subjectivity, “We see the universe as being indifferent to us, and so all morals and values are subjective human
constructions”[6].
By
affirming and subscribing to subjectivity, the Church of Satan offers itself
absolute freedom to determine its own rules and policies. In fact, the Church
of Satan plays God by offering itself absolute freedom via its justification of
man’s sovereignty.
If man
declares himself as sovereign, he gives himself the powers to kill and to
destroy. This is the source of ruthless dictatorship or ruthless man. Atheism
is capable of gross ruthlessness.
Lack of a
common belief system, an entailment of negating objective truth, is another
reason why atheism could be a dangerous killer, “The only common thread that ties all atheists together is a lack of
belief in gods and supernatural beings. Some of the best debates we have ever
had have been with fellow atheists. This
is because atheists do not have a common belief system, sacred scripture or
atheist Pope. This means atheists often disagree on many issues and ideas.
Atheists come in a variety of shapes, colors, beliefs, convictions, and
backgrounds. We are as unique as our fingerprints”[7].
When
atheism negates objectivity and upholds man’s sovereignty, subjectivity or
relativism is a natural entailment. “Every man for himself” is their motto.
Thanks to
Richard Dawkins, every man is free to dance to the music of his DNA. Every man
is free to hypothesize and establish the rules of his sociology, psychology,
and neurophysiology. Sociology, psychology, and neurophysiology become
prisoners of atheists.
Within the
atheistic worldview, what seems evil to one atheist could be conceived as the
greater good of another atheist. On what grounds would you argue with those who
perpetrate evil under the assumption that their contentious act is essentially
not an evil act?
Consider
child sex abuse as a case in point.
Thankfully
the Church of Satan believes in not harming children, “Do not harm little children” [8]. The American Psychological
Association (APA) also considers sexual abuse of children as a harmful
practice, “sexual relations between
children and adults are abusive, exploitive, reprehensible and properly
punishable by law” [9].
But NAMBLA
(North American Man Boy Love Association) believes that consensual sexual
relationship between a man and a boy is beneficial to the boy [10]! Significantly,
the American Psychological Association does not refer to consensual sex between
man and a boy as being beneficial to the boy. Whether consensual or not, sexual
relations between boy and a man is an abuse and a disorder – an evil deed.
But this is
my point; what’s evil to APA is not evil to NAMBLA. How would you resolve this
situation under an atheistic worldview that subscribes to man’s sovereignty and
subjective moral laws? At best, these organizations could debate this matter endlessly.
Even if one deems the other as evil, the other could find justification from
within the atheistic worldview to justify the evil.
The scope
for evil’s rule is much greater if atheism prevails. If Christianity as a
religion perpetrates evil, then it is a gross misrepresentation of
Christianity. Evil is not inherent in Christianity. But evil is a natural
entailment of atheism.
Christianity
cannot, by any means, justify evil. But atheism, through the portrayed instances
of the Church of Satan and NAMBLA, can justify evil.
Endnotes:
[1] http://atheists.org/activism/resources/ethics
[2] http://www.churchofsatan.com/eleven-rules-of-earth.php
[3] http://www.churchofsatan.com/nine-satanic-statements.php
[4] http://www.churchofsatan.com/faq-fundamental-beliefs.php
[5] Ibid.
[6] Ibid.
[7] https://atheists.org/activism/resources/what-is-atheism
[8] http://www.churchofsatan.com/eleven-rules-of-earth.php
[9] http://www.apa.org/about/policy/sexual-abuse.aspx
[10] http://nambla.org/data.html
7 comments:
Jesus is coming vry soon as he promised. Its a warning to people to repent n turn back from their wickedness. Turn to God for forgiveness. He l surely forgive. Let d peace of d Lord come upon u.Amen.
Apologies for a delayed response, Dr. PPK. Thank you for your thoughts. Christ will indeed come again and yes, those who do not know Christ ought to repent and seek the Lord. Amen.
God killed WAY more people than that. God is worse than atheists.
Dear Anonymous...so I think you are not an atheist, which is a good starting point. I say this since you acknowledge the existence of God, for you said, "God killed WAY more people than that. God is worse than atheists."
Even if I were to concede to your allegation, then all that matters is whether God has even one morally sufficient reason to eliminate people....and God being intrinsically good will have or has morally sufficient reason to kill....but what about all the killings done by atheists such as Pol Pot, Hitler, Stalin? What reason did they have to kill?
Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
Dear Anonymous, Any genuine Christian would not follow the ideals of Friedrich Nietzsche. Hitler was an avid follower of Nietzschen ideology. Therein ends the argument that Hitler was a Christian.
Am not saying that all atheists are evil. I have very good friends who are atheists but are very kindhearted and loving. All I am saying is that atheism paves way for evil.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts
Adolf Hitler was Roman Catholic, Pol Pot was Theravada Buddhist, Josef Stalin and Mao Zedong were atheists.
Yea but later became a atheist so his religion doesn't count.
Post a Comment