Protestant
reformation occurred in the 16th century. In other words, Protestantism
was born in the 16th century.
We live in
the 21st century. Sadly, within a span of 500 years, the spiritual
decline of the mainline Protestants (Methodist, Baptist, Lutheran,
Presbyterian, Anglican etc.) gained momentum.1
It may be
quite reasonable to date the birth of Pentecostalism to the 20th
century, although The United Holy Church and the Pentecostal Holiness Church
would date the birth of Pentecostalism to the 19th century, 1886 and
1879, respectively.2 The birth of Pentecostalism is so precious to
Christendom that Life magazine declared it as among the top 100 events of the
second millennium – ranked 68th to be precise.3
Pentecostalism
is growing at the rate of 35,000 believers a day or 13 million a year. It is the
second largest denomination in Christianity, second only to the Roman Catholics.4
God did not
sit tight watching the decline of Protestant denominations. God birthed the
Pentecostal movement.
The decline
of mainline denominations need not be construed as a decline of Christianity. The
decline merely reveals the decline of nominal Christianity, argues Ed Stetzer,
President of Lifeway Research, an evangelical research company. He said, “A
better reading of the stats is found when you move beyond the headlines and see
a long, slow (but accelerating) decline of (mostly) nominal Christianity.
However, the percentage of convictional Christians has remained relatively
steady, with some decline.”5
Ed Stetzer
is indeed right. There are greater possibilities for the nominal Christian to
reject the Lord than the spiritually mature Christians. This compels us to
consider the aspect of nominal Christianity.
The
Lausanne Movement, founded by the much acclaimed Christian evangelist Dr. Billy
Graham, characterized a nominal Christian as, “…a person who has not responded
in repentance and faith to Jesus Christ as his personal Saviour and Lord. He is a Christian in name only. He may be very religious. He may be a practising or non-practising
church member. He may give
intellectual assent to basic Christian doctrines and claim to be a Christian.
He may be faithful in attending
liturgical rites and worship services, and be an active member involved in
church affairs. But in spite of all this, he is still destined for eternal
judgment (cf. Matt. 7:21-23, Jas. 2:19) because he has not committed his life
to Jesus Christ (Romans 10:9-10)” (Emphasis Mine).6
The nominal
Christian bears personal responsibility for his spiritual malady. However, the
church is also equally responsible for the sustenance of nominal Christianity.
In our
context, since it is the nominal Christian who is more likely to reject Christ,
the church responsible for the sustenance of nominal Christianity were the
mainline Protestant churches. Therefore, the birth of Pentecostalism, which emphasizes
much on the gifts of the Holy Spirit, was much needed and extremely justified.
Praise God
from whom all blessings flow!
Being the
second largest tradition after the Roman Catholic Church, it would be worthwhile
to consider the spiritual contributions of the Pentecostal tradition to Historic Christianity.
First, Pentecostals
believe in the inspiration, inerrancy and the infallibility of the Bible. They
also believe that salvation is through Christ alone. These beliefs are vital to
control and oppose the development of the liberal and postmodern Christianity
that desacralizes the Bible to be a mere historical document and feigns
salvation upon all and sundry.
Second, nominal
Christians tend to be much lesser within the Pentecostal tradition. Pentecostals
by virtue of their theology – emphasis upon the baptism of the Holy Spirit –
tend to rather instinctively restrict the presence of nominal Christians in
their fold. A Pentecostal yearns and prays for the gifts of the Holy Spirit.
This vital desire of the Pentecostal to be the channel of the Holy Spirit’s
gifts sustains him in the Lord’s presence, thus preventing him to be a nominal
Christian.
Third, Pentecostals
are stern fundamentalists about social behavior. Many Pentecostal denominations
ban traditional vices such as alcohol, tobacco, movies, and short-sleeved
dresses. In today’s context, this much needed attribute of the local
Pentecostal church would vigorously oppose homosexuality, abortion and the
other sinful practices that many mainline churches endorse.
Last but
not the least, one of the local church’s main emphases is upon the spiritual
development of our youth. Youth are more attracted to a Pentecostal church than
a mainline church. When the mainline churches struggle to attract the youth to
attend their worship services, the natural presence of youth in their worship
services offers the Pentecostal church a tremendous advantage to nurture them
and develop their faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.
Are there
challenges to the Pentecostal movement? Yes of course!
Divisions
are always a challenge to the unity of any movement. There are almost 11,000
denominations in the Pentecostal movement. This could pose a serious challenge
to the Pentecostal movement.
However, history has
taught us a valuable lesson that there could be unity in diversity. So by the
grace of God, the various denominations of the Pentecostal movement could
thrive even amidst their differences and be united in serving God and HIS
people.
I am a
Christian. I do not consider myself a Pentecostal, for I do not believe that
all Christians ought to speak in tongues. Since speaking in tongues is one of
the prime tenets of the Pentecostal faith statement, I disqualify myself from
being a Pentecostal (although I could speak in tongues in my private prayer
time). I am more an Evangelical Christian than a Pentecostal.
There
exists a definite theological tension between the Pentecostals and the mainline
churches where each one claims spiritual superiority over the other. However,
the theological differences are not severe enough to disrupt the peace between
the concerned entities. Hence we could agree
to disagree on the theological differences and live in harmony with each other.
The need of
the hour is unity and not division. When Historic Christianity is constantly
under fire from the secular and postmodern world, I believe with all my heart
that it is the Pentecostals, Evangelicals and the faithful Christians from the
other denominations that will uphold and sustain Historic Christianity.
Blessed
indeed are the Pentecostals for they have blessed Historic Christianity
immensely. Let us pray for the continued growth and sustenance of Pentecostals
and may their service to the Lord and HIS people be much fruitful.
Endnotes:
Websites cited were last accessed on 21st July
2016.
1 http://www.pewforum.org/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape/
2 https://www.christianhistoryinstitute.org/uploaded/50cf83d3192469.20505915.pdf
3 Ibid.
4 Ibid.
5 http://edition.cnn.com/2015/05/16/living/christianity-american-dead/index.html
6 http://www.lausanne.org/content/lop/lop-10#1
Glossary of Terms:
http://www.pewforum.org/2006/10/05/spirit-and-power-a-10-country-survey-of-pentecostals2/
offers definition of the following terms:
Pentecostals
Members of denominations that emphasize the gifts of the
Holy Spirit, including the belief that speaking in tongues is necessary
evidence of the baptism of the Holy Spirit. Pentecostals belong either to one
of the historical denominations, such as the Assemblies of God and the Church
of God in Christ, that originated in the religious revivals of the early 20th
century, or to newer, largely independent churches, sometimes labeled as
neo-pentecostal churches.
Evangelicals
Members of Protestant denominations who hold traditional
religious beliefs but are neither pentecostal nor fundamentalist. Evangelicals
do not stress the gifts of the Holy Spirit (as pentecostals do), but they are
not hostile to them (as fundamentalists are). All three groups share certain
basic religious doctrines, such as the need for believers to have a conversion
experience (i.e., be “born again”) and to convert non-believers. As a
consequence, they all can be thought of as belonging to a broader evangelical
Protestant tradition.
Mainline Protestants
Members of the once-dominant Protestant denominations.
Although affirming many traditional beliefs, these churches are known for their
generally progressive theology and openness to new ideas and societal changes.
These denominations do not stress the gifts of the Holy Spirit but are often
tolerant of such practices, and thus include charismatics in their ranks.
4 comments:
Pentecostals and Evangelicals are doing great work in evangelism.
I could be classified as a Pentecostal because I go to a pentecostal church. But my bible
learning and spiritual growth is 99.99% fuelled by reformed teaching - Tim Keller, John Piper, DA Carson, Alistair Begg, RC Sproul, etc. Like you Richard anna, I do not believe that all should speak in tongues to evidence the filling of the Holy Spirit but I do speak in tongues for my spiritual edification. So I am an evangelical reformed pentecostal (a new and rare species). However, I know and am fully convinced that Jesus Christ loves me and I endeavour to love Him and my brothers to the fullest extent.
I would like to say that the pentecostal churches should learn and teach the Bible seriously. Much of the teachings are shallow. The congregants often leave with just a quotable quote and are not fully educated about a theological stance. There is often so less life and character changing teaching moments. The Spirit is not allowed to do its work to convince, convict and elicit commitment in the hearers of the word.
Having said all this, much of the mainstream churches in Chennai have some amount of exposition of the Bible. But the hearers seem to have an attitude of "been there, heard that". They also seem to be arrogant and look down on pentecostal adherents as being dumb and impressionable (I totally understand .... lol). The mainstream can incorporate the passionate atmosphere of the pentecostal church into their workings and God can bring about a mighty revival.
I agree, Soc Wor...but the timeless verses of Matthew 9:37 and Luke 10:2 are still relevant...God bless you much
Thank you for sharing your valuable thoughts, Denny.
Is it only in Pentecostal churches that the teaching of the Word is shallow? I do not think so! I think the teaching of the Word is shallow in most or shall we say, majority of the churches.
Here's my reasoning for that.
The Pastors / preachers ought to spend much time in sermon preparation if they are to expound the Word as it ought to be. But do the Pastors / preachers spend that measure of time to prepare their sermons? From what I see in the churches, I greatly doubt it. I would be more than shocked if a Pastor / preacher spends 3-4 hours to prepare a sermon. I was taught that a good sermon ought to have a good 10-12 hours of prayerful preparation.
Well what can we do....
Post a Comment