“Do not
touch my anointed ones; do my prophets no harm” (Psalm 105:15 & 1
Chronicles 16:22) is an oft resorted verse by fulltime Christian workers
(Pastors, Evangelists etc.). This is to protect them against criticism.
The Bible
narrates instances of people being cursed for accusing God’s anointed. In Numbers
12, Miriam was cursed with leprosy for criticizing Moses. 2 Kings 2: 23-25 shares
the narrative of the boys mauled by two bears because they cursed Elisha.
Many
Christian leaders are accused of immorality, false teaching, lack of financial
accountability etc. So could we accuse these anointed servants of God who serve
in HIS vineyard around the clock?
Anointing is
a prerequisite for God’s workers. However, our innate propensity to sin ensures
that accusing God's anointed is indeed a complicated predicament.
There are
two broad categories of God’s servants – the true and the false servants of God.
The true servant of God is called and anointed by God to employ his/her gift to
serve God’s people in HIS Kingdom. Then there are false workers in God’s
Kingdom, “Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing,
but inwardly they are ferocious wolves.” (Matthew 7:15, NIV).
These false
workers need not be anointed by God, since they are not called by God, yet they
serve God full time. These false workers undertake God’s work as their
permanent vocation for selfish gains.
If there
are false workers in God’s Kingdom, would not our criticism of them be
appropriate? Yes and no; this is not as easy as it seems. This is another
complicated predicament.
Consider
this complication. How do we absolutely identify a false worker? Confessions
and other investigative mechanisms do prove people’s duplicity. However, when confessions are
missing and when there are no solid evidences to prove a person’s hypocrisy, we
tread dangerously. We do not possess perfect knowledge. So with what certainty
or authority do we accuse a servant of God as a false prophet? There is always
room for error in our judgment.
Some Christians
argue that God’s workers could be criticized irrespective of Psalm 105:15 &
1 Chronicles 16:22 because these verses do not refer to criticizing God’s
servants, “Christians are to hold one another accountable for one another's
behavior (1 Jn. 3:17; Gal. 6:2; Tit. 1:9; 1 Tim. 1:3,4; 4:16; II Tim. 4:2;
Matt. 18:15-16). … Christians are to be accurate and balanced when giving
criticism. When a person or group that claims to be Christian and yet seriously
departs from the historical biblical doctrines of orthodox Christianity, one
cannot stand idly by in silence. (Matt. 18:15-16). To not speak out would be
dishonoring to God and unloving, not only to Christians, but also to the
propagators of the error.
…They point
to biblical proof texts such as Psalm 105:15, "Touch not mine anointed,
and do my prophets no harm" (KJV). But if one looks at the passage, it
will reveal that it has nothing to do with questioning the teachings of church
leaders.
In the Old
Testament the phrase, "the Lord's anointed", is used to refer to the
kings of Israel (I Samuel 12:35; 24:6, 10, 16, 23; II Samuel 1:14, 16; 19:21;
Psalms 10:6), and not to prophets. In the context of Psalms 105 the reference
is to patriarchs in general (vv. 8-15; ef, I Chronicles 16:15-22).
Psalms
105:15 has nothing to do with the issue of questioning the teachings of any of
God's "anointed". In the context of this passage, the words
"touch" and "do harm" have to do with inflicting physical
harm upon someone.
Specifically,
in I Sam. 24:6, the phrase "touch not the Lord's anointed" refers to
David's refraining from killing King Saul when he had the opportunity. It means
in that context, "not to kill".
The fact is
that David did rebuke Saul publicly more than once and called him to account
for his actions before God.”2
You may be
inclined to criticize the teaching of the person or the very character of that
person. However, there is a word of caution associated with criticizing God’s
servants when there are no confessions and/or no solid evidences against the said
person.
If you are
inclined to slay the character of a God’s servant, then ensure that you “Try
everything in your power to contact the person and have them or a
representative explain themselves.”3 Do not blindly trust the media
or ride the gossip bandwagon. We would be better off to err on the side of grace/caution.
We should do our due diligence before attacking the character of God’s
anointed.
Whatever
the case may be, if you are to criticize God’s anointed, do know that “…there
is scrutiny and there is malicious intent—two very separate ideals. When you
scrutinize someone, please make sure it's with 1) Godly intent about his or her
teaching, and 2) not against the person
themselves. I've read many examples—especially on message boards—where a
preacher's character is maligned because of something he or she taught or is
NOT teaching…That's where people fail to take care when they "touch God's
anointed." Their words are simply malicious.
And,
malicious intent against anyone, much less God's anointed, isn't without its
consequences.
We know
from 2 Kings 2:23-24 what happened to 42 youth from Bethel who maliciously
mocked Elisha, certainly one of God's anointed. "He went up from there to
Bethel, and going up on the way, little boys came out of the city and made fun
of him and said to him, "Go up, you bald head! Go up, you bald head!"
He turned around, saw them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. Then two
she-bears came out of the woods and ripped open forty-two of the boys."
This type of mockery implied malicious intent,
perhaps to maim or kill Elisha. At that time, the epithet "baldy"
signified contempt in the East and showed severe disrespect for Elisha's
message and God's power. God sent the bears as a judgment for their callous
unbelief.
God may not
be so blatant these days. But again, there are consequences.
So what
should Christ followers do when they find themselves in disagreement with someone
in the ministry? At least these three things:
Make sure
that what you are disagreeing with is something that person actually said. I've
seen a lot of people comment on things they don't even investigate and simply
assume it's true because they read something somewhere or heard it from someone
else.
Most
importantly, check it against Scripture. This is the ultimate test.
Don't go
off half-cocked and rebuke anybody at time in any place—most specifically on
the Internet—when you disagree with someone. Try everything in your power to
contact the person and have them or a representative explain themselves.
Matthew 18:15-16 says, "Now if your brother sins against you, go and tell
him his fault between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have gained your
brother. But if he does not listen, then take with you one or two others, that
by the testimony of two or three witnesses every word may be established"
(MEV).
There
certainly isn't a lack of public rebuke on the Internet. A great deal of it is
mean-spirited and not meant for godly correction, but as it appears, for some
people to simply make themselves feel better…Pastor Kenny Luck calls it
"spiritual nitpicking."
It is
important—nay, crucial—for Christ followers, as Hux says, "not (to) render
a condemning judgment upon anyone (that alone is for God), but to render a
discerning judgment upon all teachings. It is important for Christians to test
all things by Scripture" as the Bereans did with Paul in Acts 17:11.
"These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, for they received the
word with all eagerness, daily examining the Scriptures, to find out if these
things were so" (MEV).”4
Endnotes:
1https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyDaYlEIYM8 (Go to the 1:36:38 mark to listen to this
caution)
2http://www.watchman.org/articles/other-religious-topics/accountability-the-way-to-touch-gods-anointed/
3http://www.charismanews.com/opinion/54342-be-careful-when-you-touch-god-s-anointed
4Ibid.
1 comment:
Criticized? I think that is a stretch. The scripture tells us that judgment begins at the house of God. Those spiritual leaders (of which I am one, by the way) who are clearly (not hearsay, rumors, etc) defying God, His Word, & His vision should be 'confronted.' 'Criticize' is a strong word for any person; so I use the word confront and even correction. But criticism, I am sure, has its place and should not be ruled out. But there are also countless examples in Scripture (2 Kings 2:23-24 or so, Numbers 12, and many other scriptures) where disrespect to one of God's anointed or God's house is taken personally by God. But I think that any prophet, spiritual leader, etc. in scripture and in modern times can unknowingly and knowingly be in error; and should be accountable to a group. My suggestion is that those holding him or her accountable be spiritual men or women who are astute in the Word, have proven no ulterior motives; and are affiliated with other ministries. Also men who aren't necessarily bosom buddies with the one being held accountable.
Post a Comment