The question “Does the Bible contain
errors or not?” will evoke contradictory responses even from the most eminent Christian
evangelical scholars. The two major contradicting groups are unlimited inerrantists and limited inerrantists.
Unlimited
Inerrancy teaches that the Bible is without error in all that it affirms.1
Limited
Inerrancy considers the Bible as
inerrant (without error) in only what it teaches. In other words, the Bible’s
inerrancy is limited to only redemptive matters.
Christian evangelical scholars have
studied, discussed and debated this subject at the highest academic forums for
years and yet hold contradictory positions. But they remain as true and sincere
Christians.
Given this situation, how should a simple Christian – who is not
trained in a Bible college or seminary – contemplate the complex theme of biblical
inerrancy?
Faith Alone
Famed Christian evangelist Billy Graham went
through a crisis of faith when his evangelist friend Charles “Chuck” Templeton
questioned the veracity (truthfulness or accuracy) of the Bible and abandoned
his faith in Christ. Billy Graham, however, overcame his crisis situation.
Billy Graham reminisced those
moments, “The exact wording of my prayer is beyond recall, but it must have
echoed my thoughts: “O God! There are many things in this book I do not
understand. … I can’t answer some of the philosophical and psychological
questions Chuck [Templeton] and others are raising.” I was trying to be on the
level with God, but something remained unspoken. At last the Holy Spirit freed
me to say it: “Father, I am going to accept this as Thy Word—by faith!” … I sensed
the presence and power of God as I had not sensed it in months.”2
Templeton’s departure from
Christianity did not deter Billy Graham. He survived the crisis and became a
more committed believer in Christ.
How?
Through faith. Simple faith!
You and I will not be remiss if we
simply believe that the Bible is the word of God.
Truth Alone
The truthfulness of Christianity is independent
of the Bible. Christian apologist Frank Turek explains this position:3
Is
Christianity true just because the inerrant Bible says it is? No.
Christianity would still be true even if the Bible was never written.
… some of us
erroneously think that Christian beliefs cannot be sustained unless the Bible
is without error. That would mean that
the Christian faith is a house of cards ready to collapse if one verse or
reference in the New Testament is discovered to be false.
Although I
think are good reasons to believe in an inerrant Bible, inerrancy is an
unnecessarily high standard by which to establish the central event in
Christianity—the Resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth (which we celebrate this
Sunday). Christianity hinges on that
historical event. If Christ rose from
the dead, then, game over, Christianity is true. On the other hand, if he didn’t rise from the
dead, then, as a first-century eyewitness by the name of Paul admitted,
Christianity is false.
But you don’t
need inerrant sources to establish that the Resurrection actually happened, or
any other historical event for that matter.
For example, if you found an error in the stat line of a football game,
should you assume that every game, story and stat line in the newspaper was a
complete fabrication? Then why do some
people do that with the New Testament?
Why do they assume that unless every word of it is true, then most of it
is false?
They assume
that because they are confusing the fact of the Resurrection with the reports
of the Resurrection. Conflicting reports of a historical event are evidence
that the event actually occurred, not the reverse. In other words, to return to our sports
analogy, the only reason there is an error in the stat line, to begin with, is
because the game was actually played and someone tried to report on that
game. Neither the stat line nor the
error would exist unless the game had actually been played. After all, who reports on a game that didn’t
actually take place?
The same is
true with the documents comprising the New Testament and the Resurrection. Even if one were to find an error or
disagreement between the multiple accounts of the Resurrection story, the very
fact that there are several eyewitness accounts shows that something dramatic
actually happened in history—especially since the folks who wrote it down had
everything to lose by proclaiming Jesus rose from the dead.
That is, all
of the New Testament reporters (except Luke) were observant Jews who would pay
dearly for proclaiming the Resurrection.
Why would Jewish believers in Yahweh—people who thought they were God’s
“chosen people” for two thousand years—invent a Resurrection story that would
get them excommunicated from the “chosen people” club, and then beaten, tortured
and murdered?
Answer: they wouldn’t. They saw something dramatic
that they weren’t expecting. Then they
proclaimed it, altered their lives because of it, and later wrote about it,
despite the fact that doing any of that would get them killed.
So Christianity
isn’t true just because the Bible says it’s true. Christianity is true because
an event occurred. True, we wouldn’t
know much about Christianity if the reports of the Resurrection had never been
written, but the Resurrection preceded the reports of it.
As my friend
Andy Stanley asks, “Do you realize that there were thousands of Christians
before a line of the New Testament was ever written?” Paul was a Christian before he wrote a word
of the New Testament. So was Matthew,
John, James, Peter, etc. Why? Because they had witnessed the resurrected
Jesus.
Contrary to
what some skeptics may think, the New Testament writers didn’t create the
Resurrection—the Resurrection created the New Testament writers. In other words, the New Testament documents
didn’t give us the Resurrection. The
Resurrection gave us the New Testament documents! There would be no New Testament unless the
Resurrection had occurred. Observant
Jews would never have invented that.
This why the
foundational beliefs of Christianity—what C.S. Lewis called Mere
Christianity—are true even if the reports have some errors. Getting details wrong in reporting the
Resurrection doesn’t change the larger point that the Resurrection actually
happened. In fact, if all of the
accounts agreed on every detail, we’d rightly assume they colluded. Actual eyewitnesses never describe the same
historical event in the same way.
For example,
survivors of the Titanic disagreed how the ship sank. Some say it broke in two and then sank. Others say the thought it went down
whole. Does that disagreement mean that
we shouldn’t believe the Titanic sank?
Of course not. They all agree on
that! They were just viewing the same
historical event from different vantage points.
Likewise, all
the writers agree that the Resurrection occurred, but they differ on the minor
details (Who got to the tomb first? Did
you see one angel or two? etc.). And
these differences aren’t necessarily contradictions, but the natural result of
viewing the same historical event from different vantage points.
The historical
documents we’ve collected and put into one binding we call the New Testament
are just what the name implies— they are testaments or reports of what
honorable people witnessed and had no motive to invent. In fact, given who they were and how they
suffered, they had every motive to say it wasn’t true. And there are several other excellent reasons
that show it takes more faith to be an atheist than a Christian.
So inerrant
Bible or not, the Resurrection we celebrate on Sunday actually occurred about
1,985 years ago. That means you can trust that one day you’ll be resurrected
like Jesus if you put your trust in him.
Conclusion
There is nothing wrong if we, by
mere faith, believe that the Bible is God’s Word.
Christianity is true whether or not
the Bible has errors. Without diluting the significance of the Bible to any
extent, there is also nothing wrong if we do not consider biblical inerrancy as an essential doctrine of Historic
Christianity.
Endnotes:
1https://billygraham.org/decision-magazine/may-2014/take-a-stand-on-biblical-inerrancy/
2https://defendinginerrancy.com/billy-graham-and-biblical-inerrancy/
3https://crossexamined.org/christianity-is-true-even-if-some-of-the-bible-isnt/
Websites last
accessed on 21st August 2019.
No comments:
Post a Comment