I submit the answers that have satisfied me to the questions
I posted in my previous blog in the hope and prayer that these answers will resonate
in you.
Questions against
God either lead us towards HIM or away from HIM. Fundamentally, if we temporarily
ignore agnosticism, we have two broad options - theism (belief in God) or
atheism (denial of God’s existence). If we choose not to believe in God, then
we ought to subscribe to chance or randomness or a similar variant.
It takes
more faith to be an atheist than a theist. Consider a question, “how did the
universe come into being?” The theist will affirm God as the creator of the
universe with all its minute fine-tunings and splendor. The atheist will posit the
universe to have randomly banged into its fascinating existence. When the
atheist denies God, he denies causal intelligence, so the only other option for
causation is chance or randomness.
Isn’t it
simple and realistic to believe that God created and sustains the universe; an
intelligence behind a fascinating creation?
Analogically,
how did a dictionary come into existence? A simple yet realistic belief is that
man’s intelligence created the dictionary. Dictionary did not randomly bang into
existence.
Hence, it
takes more faith to be an atheist than a theist. An atheist who denies faith in
God places his faith on an obscure aspect such as chance, simultaneously taking
great pleasure in it. Rejecting God leads people into murky and muddy waters,
more often a quicksand situation leading to the death of their soul.
Q1: Why wasn’t
I born in a wealthy home? Why wasn’t I born in a country that’s more
sophisticated and comfortable than India?
Q2: Why didn’t
God gift me an eidetic memory or the mind of a genius to excel in studies and
profession or why didn’t God gift me with incredible athleticism to excel in
sports?
Q3: Why didn’t
God give me influential friends who would have helped me ascend greater heights?
Desiring
for a better status in birth (wealthy home and a better country) or greater
gifts (eidetic memory or being a genius or athleticism) or influential friends
presupposes a notion of selfish pleasure via greater good a.k.a. “I want to be
better than what I am now.”
A human
mind stakes claim to omniscience when it desires for a greater good. When
desiring for a greater good, the mind affirms that it is good to possess a
greater good.
If I am to
travel to a particular location connected by air and road, then for the sake of
time it would be better to fly to that location. This is the greater good.
But would I
be 100% certain that my flight would reach safely? No, none of us can be sure. Hence,
although I desire for a greater good, I would never be sure if that’s the best plan
for me, for I am not omniscient. Only God is omniscient.
God alone knows
what is good for me and you. More often, we will never know what is good for us
and what is not.
It’s better
to be born in a poor yet godly home than being born in wealthy yet godless
home.
Furthermore,
two questions can be asked – one existential and another metaphysical. First, “Has
not God blessed me now?” There are people living in poverty - without basic
necessities of life. Comparatively, God has blessed me abundantly.
Second, “Do
I know the extent of blessing that would satisfy me?” Given his selfishness, man
would seldom be contented with his possessions.
But if God
is a maximally great being, then my life ought to be subordinate to God. If God
is my Father, then I am HIS child. So I should learn contentment (cf.
Philippians 4: 11b), for HE alone has the best plan for my life.
However, it
would be more legitimate for homeless, who lack life’s basic necessities, to
ask this question. But wouldn’t homelessness be extinct if the wealthy share a
portion of their blessings to bless the homeless with basic necessities? God
blesses the haves for the blessing of the have-nots (Cf. James 2: 14-17). Therefore,
the presence of poor is not the failure of God but the failure of the wealthy that
are selfish.
God is a
God of love, justice, and perfect knowledge. My birth and gifts are HIS
decisions for my life. The foundation of God’s decision is HIS perfect love and
justice. Although there is nothing wrong in desiring for something better, I
stand satisfied with what I have been given because God has blessed my life in
accordance with HIS plan for the universe and me. I trust in God’s love, justice
and perfect knowledge.
Furthermore,
when God who rules the heaven and earth is always with me, why do I need influential
friends, who are mere subordinates to God? Therefore, when I learn to be
content, I would need more of God than influential friends.
Q4: Why did
God give me suffering? More so, why are babies born with birth defects? Can’t
the Almighty God prevent this evil from occurring? Does HE not know the demands
and the ensuing stress the parents endure?
Q5: Why do the
wicked prosper, especially those who perpetrate horrendous evil? Why do the
righteous suffer and suffer much?
Q6: Why does
God allow despicable upbringing of children that often results in their
notoriety in abusing fellow humans?
Although the
God of the Bible offers the best answer to the conundrum of evil, the problem
of evil is a question every worldview must answer, be it atheistic, agnostic or
theistic.
The problem
of evil does not pose an explicit contradiction or a logical incompatibility
between God and evil. In fact a logical consistency between God and evil has been
proved by positing morally sufficient reasons for God to allow evil.
The
probabilistic problem of evil can be adequately reasoned out; man’s finitude and
the Bible’s reasoning for the plausible coexistence between God and evil are
more than adequate. Works of the Christian analytic philosophers Dr. Alvin
Plantinga and Dr. William Lane Craig can be accessed for a deeper grasp into this
subject.
God does
not cause evil. Evil exists because God allows it for a season and for a
reason. The Bible teaches that God will destroy evil once and for all. The
Bible also teaches that evil will not be totally annihilated in this time and
age. So the question is not if God can destroy evil, instead it’s about why God
allows evil.
This
question can be raised from another vantage point. Could not have God created a
world without evil? Wouldn’t a world without evil be the best of all possible
worlds? Is this world we live in the best of all possible worlds?
To cut the
long story short, I borrow Dr. Plantinga’s thoughts to state that this is the
most feasible world available to God with the quantum of good and evil that
was, is, and will be present.
The Bible
teaches that suffering is inevitable for man. But how do we endure suffering? Every
human being suffers either momentarily or for a period of time. But the God of
the Bible never abandons HIS people who are suffering. In fact, God strengthens
HIS people to endure suffering (1 Peter 5: 10).
Personally,
I experience God’s comforting and encouraging presence in my suffering. The key to endure suffering is to stand
firm in our faith (1 Peter 5: 9 Cf. Job 1: 21, 6: 10). I see suffering as
an opportunity to get closer to God.
So faith in
God is mandatory to endure suffering and to receive HIS strength, wisdom and
power, for it is only God who can offer the power to bear the pain. Moreover,
we know that this suffering is only momentary and in the world that is to come
there will be no more suffering for those who believe in God.
Q7: Why has
God made it difficult for people to understand, believe and love HIM?
Statistics
emphasize that theists vastly outnumber atheists. Since most people believe in
God, the question whether God has made it difficult for people to know HIM is
self-destructing.
However,
the question gains legitimacy from within the perspective of individual
worldviews. A Christian may wonder why not all are Christians and likewise a
Muslim may wonder why not all are Muslims.
Since there
can be only one maximally great being called as God, it is God’s responsibility
to reveal HIMSELF to people. Therefore, if God has adequately revealed HIS
presence and activity, then this question becomes invalid.
The Bible
emphasizes that man suppresses truth to believe in the lie and that mankind
would be without an excuse on the Day of Judgment (Cf. Romans 1: 18-20).
Therefore God has revealed HIMSELF more than adequately for man to believe in
HIM. When man denies God, it’s the fault of man and not God.
Q8: Why do
wealthy Christians not part with their abundance for noble deeds?
Q9: Why do
Christians hate each other so to harm their own brother and sister who have
done no wrong?
Q10: Why are
Christian churches corrupt so to render God as non-existent and destroy the
faith of God’s own people?
Evil and
Corruption in Christians and in Christian churches are inevitable since all men
are sinners. The Bible affirms this fact when it emphasizes that there is not
even one who is righteous.
But
Christians, by virtue of their supernatural transformation, are to continually
grow in holiness. Once again, it’s not God’s fault that a Christian or a
Christian Church fails to grow in holiness, but it’s the fault of the
individual and the institution.
God has
done everything for man to be better, but man chooses not to be better. God
allows man to sin. Although man can draw power from God to overcome sin, he chooses
not to draw this power from God, which then is the fault of man and not God.
A Christian
or a Christian church fails because they do not remain in God. When we do not
remain in God, we are devoured by the devil.
One cannot
expect 100% perfection from any Christian church for the church is a congregation
of sinners. Although a church may appear to be righteous from the outside, it more
often is not righteous when the church’s private is publicized.
Primarily, the
elders of the church of Jesus Christ are to practice love. This love ought to
be showered upon those who support as well as oppose them.
The
contemporary church is content to let people walk away from their church.
However, the church of Jesus Christ should go after that one (believing) sheep,
just as how the Lord incarnate went after that one sheep leaving the ninety
nine behind (Matthew 18: 12-14). 1
What then
is the solution for the Christian church? Sadly, I believe this situation will worsen
in the future. The Bible affirms much of the Christian church to be an epitome
of evil (Cf. 2 Timothy 3: 1-5; Matthew 7: 14). Many Christians and Christian
churches will possess a form of godliness, but their godliness will be devoid
of God’s power (v5).
In a
nutshell, the majority of Christians and the Christian churches will be lovers
of pleasure than being lovers of God.
How then
should a Christian live? First, he should remain in Christ. Second, he should
live for the truth by constantly battling the devil by the power of God.
Christians
who live for the sake of God and HIS word will be grossly outnumbered and will
live as a minority. They will be persecuted by their own family (Matthew 10:
36) – the biological and the Church family. The Bible affirms, “In fact, everyone who wants to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be
persecuted…” (2 Timothy 3: 12, NIV, Emphasis mine).
Christ implores
us to remain in HIM through the following words, “He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me; and he
who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who does not
take his cross and follow after Me is not worthy of Me. He who has found his
life will lose it, and he who has lost his life for My sake will find it”
(Matthew 10: 37-39).
May we
realize God’s enabling power to find Christ, remain in HIM, and love HIM always.
Amen.
Endnotes:
1 The lost sheep in the Matthean
narrative refers to the believers, while the lost sheep in the Lukan narrative
refers to the unbelievers.
No comments:
Post a Comment